| [ | Date | | | 2026-03-29 15:02 -0400 | ] |
My local grocery store reports that it sells its brand’s canned tonic water at the following per-liter prices:
| Format | Price (CAD) | Reported price by volume (CAD/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Small cans 6x222mL | 4.29 | 19.30 |
| Larger cans 12x355mL | 8.29 | 23.40 |
This is immediately surprising for two reasons:
The smaller package, made of smaller cans, is reported as less expensive by volume than the larger package. Usually, larger purchases correspond to lower prices by amount of product.
The prices are abnormally high: they would mean that the amount of soda in a 2L bottle would sell for about $40.
Let us compute the actual per-liter prices:
Small cans: ;
larger cans: .
This confirms that the prices on the label were both incorrect, by about an order of magnitude.
Notes:
I am surprised, but probably should not be, that this is not properly automated: I assumed that most products would be registered in a database with all the relevant details, including volume or mass of product, so that labels could be emitted automatically. Perhaps the inconsistent descriptions between the two labels was a telltale sign (“boisson gaz tonique diete” vs “soda tonique diete”).
Reverse-engineering the numbers tells me that the per-liter price of the small cans, $19.30, was likely computed as (dividing by gets us closer to 19.30); and for the larger cans as .
So the printed per-volume prices are as if the unit price were for a single can.
Quick links: